Nitin Menon replaces Nigel Llong in Elite panel of umpires for 2020-21


India’s Nitin Menon has been included within the ICC Elite panel of umpires for the 2020-21 season after the annual assessment performed by the sport’s governing physique. At 36, Menon is without doubt one of the youngest to be included within the Elite panel. He was earlier a part of the Worldwide panel and can exchange England’s Nigel Llong within the Elite roster.

A panel consisting of ICC common supervisor of cricket Geoff Allardice (chairman), former participant Sanjay Manjrekar, and match referees Ranjan Madugalle and David Boon made the choice.

The ICC screens umpires’ standing via numerous parameters, together with on-field decision-making, the variety of critiques the match official has received proper, and conduct on the sphere. Accordingly, factors are tallied and umpires are ranked internally.

As per ESPNcricinfo’s data, Llong has had the best proportion (36.2%) of his reviewed selections overturned in Assessments since September 28, 2017.

Menon, who started his umpiring profession in 2017, has officiated in three Assessments, 24 ODIs and 16 T20Is in males’s cricket. He has additionally stood in ten girls’s T20Is, together with the 2018 and 2020 T20 World Cups. After S Venkataraghavan and S Ravi, he’s the third umpire from India to make it to the Elite panel.

“It is an awesome honour and matter of pleasure for me to be named within the Elite panel,” Menon stated in an ICC launch. “To be officiating frequently together with the main umpires and referees of the world is one thing that I at all times dreamt of and the sensation has but to sink in.

“Having already officiated in Assessments, ODIs and T20Is in addition to in ICC occasions, I perceive the good accountability that comes with the job. I additionally really feel it is a accountability on me to take Indian umpires ahead and assist them by sharing my experiences.”

Adrian Griffith, the ICC’s senior supervisor of umpires and referees, congratulated Menon, saying he “has come via our pathway system with very constant performances”.

Final 12 months, England’s Michael Gough and West Indies’ Joel Wilson were promoted to the Elite panel, whereas Ravi was omitted from the checklist.

‘Not shocked by Menon’s choice’ – Taufel

Taufel, who has labored extensively with Indian umpires, stated he was not “shocked” by Menon’s elevation. “I am not shocked by his choice as his expertise was evident some years in the past,” Taufel informed ESPNcricinfo. “However once more it exhibits that it takes a few years to get to world-class, via dedication, dedication, resilience and a progress mindset. With Nitin becoming a member of the highest group, a task mannequin is there for a lot of Indian umpires who aspire to be the most effective. Hopefully, it’s going to encourage the BCCI to maintain investing of their growth applications for match officers.”

ICC Elite panel of umpires: Aleem Dar, Kumar Dharmasena, Marais Erasmus, Chris Gaffaney, Michael Gough, Nitin Menon, Richard Illingworth, Richard Kettleborough, Bruce Oxenford, Paul Reiffel, Rod Tucker and Joel Wilson

ICC Elite panel of match referees: David Boon, Chris Broad, Jeff Crowe, Ranjan Madugalle, Andy Pycroft, Richie Richardson and Javagal Srinath


Mark Taylor raises prospect of Boxing Day Test being moved


Former Australia captain Mark Taylor has raised the prospect of the Australia-India Boxing Day Check being moved away from the MCG if different venues are in a position to host bigger crowds.

Though nonetheless six months away, the latest spike in Covid-19 instances in Victoria – 75 had been recorded on Monday – has introduced into doubt when crowds will be capable of return within the state.

Adelaide and Perth have been talked of as alternate options for the Boxing Day encounter with each South Australia and Western Australia persevering with to ease restrictions. Perth Stadium is about to have the ability to fill its 60,000 capability for soccer matches from the center of July whereas Adelaide Oval is ready to host crowds of as much as 25,000 – 50% of its capability.

“In case you take a look at what’s occurring round Australia, by Christmas time the MCG might solely be capable of host 10,000-20,000 individuals, which isn’t going to look nice while you’ve obtained an actual iconic Check match,” Taylor informed 9’s Sports activities on Sunday.

“You progress that match to Optus Stadium and even the Adelaide Oval, you are going to get full venues. The Adelaide Oval and Optus Stadium will probably be working exhausting to try to get that sport as a result of they might look higher with full crowds.”

Whereas the prospects of the Australia-India collection happening have been promising for a while, there had been a chat of the likelihood that it must be played behind closed doors – as would be the case when worldwide cricket returns with the England-West Indies collection subsequent month – with India probably utilizing a single venue as a hub.

Nevertheless, because the Covid-19 scenario improved within the nation so too did the hopes of a standard schedule though the scenario in Victoria is a reminder of how rapidly issues can change. The current schedule has the collection being performed in Brisbane, Adelaide, Melbourne and Sydney with Perth internet hosting Afghanistan in late November however Cricket Australia had mentioned all fixtures had been topic to vary. Western Australia although voiced their anger at not being given a profitable India Check.

Talking final week, Australia captain Tim Paine mentioned he hoped to be taking part in in entrance of crowds this season.

“Given the present circumstances, I dare say every thing is properly and actually on the desk. We’re hopeful that all over the place we play come summer season, we might be capable of have crowds,” he mentioned. “How large they’re, we do not know, clearly. Nevertheless it’s a tough one for anybody to reply as a result of there’s a lot altering week to week, day after day. Give it’s three or 4 months, we simply do not know what it’ll appear to be.

“Definitely, from a participant’s standpoint, we need to be taking part in in entrance of huge crowds at the very best venues and a giant day like Boxing Day is one thing that everybody appears ahead to and a giant a part of that’s taking part in on the MCG.

“Fingers crossed issues are going properly sufficient that we will do this however, as I mentioned, we’re spoilt for selection right here in Australia with some world-class stadiums. If one thing needed to change, then, once more, now we have loads of choices.”


Shikha Pandey says don’t ‘tinker with fabric of women’s game’, but market it well


India pace-bowling allrounder Shikha Pandey has turn into the most recent in an extended line of cricketers to supply views on whether or not girls’s cricket wants any tweaks – like smaller balls or shorter pitches – to assist it additional flourish and appeal to extra followers. In a collection of tweets, Pandey on Saturday mentioned “many of the solutions” to change the ladies’s sport had been “superfluous”.

“Please, do not evaluate girls’s sport, girls’s cricket on this case, with males’s sport. We have to see it as a distinct sport altogether… A sport that 86,174 spectators turned as much as watch on March 8, 2020 and a number of other million watched reside on their tv units,” she tweeted, referring to the record crowd on the remaining of the 2020 T20 World Cup between Australia and India on the MCG in March.

A mainstay of the Indian assault that completed runners-up each on the 2017 ODI World Cup and the latest T20 World Cup, Pandey wrote, “Lowering the scale of the ball is ok, however as Ian Smith instructed, it solely works if the load stays the identical. This can permit for bowlers to grip the ball higher – extra revs for the spinners – and hits may also journey additional (not be the case whether it is mild).”

As for lowering the size of the pitch from 22 yards, Pandey mentioned: “An Olympic 100m feminine sprinter would not run 80m to win First place medal and clock the identical timing as her male counterpart,” she wrote. “So the entire ‘reducing the size of the pitch’ for no matter causes appears doubtful. Additionally, it virtually positively takes the double-headers [with the men’s teams] out of query.”

As a substitute of “tinkering with guidelines or the very material of the sport to draw an viewers”, Pandey mentioned, “Progress may be achieved by advertising and marketing the game effectively.”

She additionally advocated extra expertise within the girls’s sport. “Why not have DRS, Snicko, Hotspot, all the technical acumen and reside broadcast for each sport that we play wherever on the planet.”

Potential adjustments to the ladies’s sport, comparable to utilizing a shorter pitch and a smaller ball, had been suggested by New Zealand captain Sophie Devine and India batter Jemimah Rodrigues in a latest webinar performed by the ICC. Then, in a collection of interviews by ESPNcricinfo final week, the likes of Smriti Mandhana, Rachael Haynes, Lea Tahuhu, Kate Cross and Nida Dar had also laid out their views on the debate.

“If it [the act of proposing tweaks] is about bringing it [women’s cricket] aesthetically nearer to the lads’s sport, I do not suppose that is the best option to go about it. The ladies’s sport is an efficient product that is persevering with to evolve & make its personal mark,” Haynes mentioned.

ALSO READ: Should the women’s game use a shorter pitch and a smaller ball?

Tahuhu identified that “when you’re having to arrange two-sized pitches, you then lose out the chance to host double-headers with males, whereas Mandhana added: “Though I really feel girls’s cricket is thrilling as it’s… lowering the size would possibly make it attention-grabbing from the viewer’s perspective.”

Cross and Dar emphasised that higher infrastructural and financial funding and extra publicity on the a part of the media is the perfect option to the take the ladies’s sport ahead. “Having the WBBL, the KSL, the Hundred or a girls’s IPL – that is the sort of change the ladies’s sport wants,” mentioned Cross, whereas Dar questioned, “How about publicising the matches rigorously on social media and mainstream media? … Give gamers extra incentive to lift the usual of the sport and issues will get extra entertaining.”


‘Match-fixing law will be a game-changer in India’


Making match-fixing a prison offence can be a “game-changer” and the “single-most-effective factor” for sport in India. That’s the sturdy perception of Steve Richardson, the coordinator of investigations on the ICC’s anti-corruption unit (ACU). Ajit Singh, the pinnacle of the BCCI’s ACU, concurs with that viewpoint, including that India additionally wants a “very sturdy legislation” towards betting, which is believes is the supply of corruption in cricket in India.

With India scheduled to host two world marquee males’s occasions within the subsequent three years – the 2021 T20 World Cup adopted by the ODI World Cup in 2023 – Richardson urged the Indian authorities to contemplate making a match-fixing legislation for sport like its neighbour Sri Lanka.

In 2019 Sri Lanka turned the primary main cricket-playing nation in South Asia to criminalise match-fixing with punishments together with a 10-year jail sentence. The ICC ACU had helped the then Sri Lanka authorities to draft the laws within the wake of in depth investigations that discovered a number of Lankan cricketers together with former captain Sanath Jayasuriya responsible of breaching the corruption code.

“India has received two ICC world occasions arising: the T20 World Cup [in 2021] and the World Cup in 2023,” Richardson mentioned. “In the mean time with no laws in place, we’ll have good relations with Indian police, however they’re working with one hand tied behind their again. We are going to do every thing we are able to to disrupt the corruptors. And we do, we make life very, very troublesome for them as far and as a lot as we are able to to cease them from working freely.

“However the laws could be a game-changer in India. We’ve presently slightly below 50 investigations. The vast majority of these have hyperlinks again to corruptors in India. So it will be the single-most-effective factor to occur by way of defending sport if India introduces match-fixing laws.”

Each Richardson and Singh have been taking part in a panel dialogue with regards to ‘Does India want a match-fixing laws?’ as a part of the Sports activities Legislation & Coverage Symposium held on June 20. The remainder of the panel comprised Supreme Court docket lawyer Rebecca John, who represented Sreesanth within the IPL spot-fixing case, senior journalist Pradeep Journal, and Suhrith Parthasarthy, a lawyer within the Madras Excessive Court docket.

Greater than the gamers, Richardson confused the legislation would deter the corruptors, who he mentioned have been proper now freely shifting round. “I might truly ship to the Indian police or the Indian authorities now a minimum of eight names of people who find themselves what I’d time period serial offenders, continuously approaching gamers to attempt to get them to repair matches,” Richardson mentioned. “In the mean time with the shortage of legislative framework in India it is extremely restricted what the police can do, and to that extent they’ve my nice sympathy as a result of they fight as professionally and arduous as they’ll to make the prevailing laws work, however the actuality is it wasn’t framed with sports activities corruption in thoughts.

“So the explanation that there’s an crucial for laws particular to match-fixing – sure, it’s concerning the gamers, however extra importantly it’s about these exterior the game who truly corrupt the gamers and are organising and pulling the strings of those networks. These are the folks I wish to see handled below match-fixing legislation.”

To help his stance, Richardson offered the instance of the Bribery Act within the UK, which was used to prosecute former Pakistan batsman Nasir Jamshed, who pleaded guilty to prices of bribery within the PSL. Jamshed was handed a 17-month sentence in February by a Manchester court docket. In 2010, the Pakistan trio of Salman Butt, Mohammad Asif and Mohammad Amir have been prosecuted below the 1906 Prevention of Corruption Act which was repealed by the Bribery Act.

“I see this from a barely completely different perspective inasmuch as I don’t see the gamers as the primary drawback with regards to match-fixing,” Richardon mentioned. “The gamers are the ultimate hyperlink within the chain who truly would exit on to the pitch and carry out any act if they’d agreed to take action. The issue that I see is additional upstream and it is within the people who find themselves organising the corruption, people who find themselves paying the gamers the cash, and most of these sit exterior of the game.”

‘No sufficient legislation to cowl match-fixing’

As far Singh was involved, he mentioned the BCCI’s ACU might do “little” so far as the “non-participants” have been involved. However Singh, a former Indian Police Service officer, who served as DGP Rajasthan earlier than taking charge at the BCCI in 2018, agreed that there had been “no sufficient legislation to cowl match-fixing”, which each the federal authorities in addition to the courts have recognised beforehand.

In 2013, the then Indian authorities even offered a draft invoice for the prevention of sporting fraud, however it has not been acted on subsequently. The draft invoice covers the definition of sporting fraud, the perpetrators, and the punishment – which may lengthen to 5 years of imprisonment, a positive of INR 10 lakh or 5 occasions the profit derived from the sporting fraud.

In 2016, the RM Lodha Committee, which drew up the framework that paved means for the structural reform of the BCCI, instructed the Supreme Court docket that the Legislation Fee of India (LCI) ought to look into criminalising match-fixing in sport. Two years later, the LCI agreed that match-fixing of any variety in sport, together with cricket, needs to be a prison offence carrying important punishment. Calling playing and betting two sides of the identical coin, the LCI additionally really useful to the Indian authorities that it contemplate regulating betting and playing actions as towards imposing full prohibition.

“So undoubtedly there’s a requirement for a legislation which criminalises match-fixing,” Singh mentioned. In accordance with Singh, the roots of match-fixing lie in betting, which he described as a “malaise” in India.

“Simply to make windfall positive factors illegally in an unlawful means by betting they [corruptors] method the members – it could possibly be a participant, it could possibly be a curator, it could possibly be a match official, whoever. And the quantities of the cash concerned are unimaginable.”

Betting legislation – ‘completely archaic and the punishments are laughable’

Singh mentioned unverified accounts point out annual turnover from betting in India is within the vary of INR 30-40,000 crores. Singh identified that the corrupters weren’t simply working in worldwide sport, however have been additionally busy influencing gamers and matches in home cricket with some even posing as “godfathers” to younger gamers

“It is fairly an anomaly which you could wager INR 500 on the result of a match for a facet to win/lose in India and that may be unlawful. Nonetheless, when you provide USD 30,000 to a participant to underperform in that match then there’s nothing unlawful in that.”

Steve Richardson, ICC ACU’s coordinator of Investigations

Singh mentioned the BCCI’s ACU had used information companies like Sportradar to look at the extent of betting in some T20 matches in Indian home cricket. “It is not the IPL, however it’s the state leagues. It (betting) involves the tune of perhaps [up to 20 million] euros or kilos. So the quantity of betting even in small matches is a lot that the temptation to fall prey to the calls for or requests of those folks could be very excessive. And it’s extra so with individuals who do not see a lot of a future for themselves.

“Cricket is performed in rural areas and mofussil cities and there are specific godfathers have come to finance them. They see a promising participant, finance the participant, change into his patron, and finally what occurs is when he’s at a degree the place his video games are televised, the place he has made it to a sure league, then they extract the pound of flesh. So it must be curbed closely, each on the match-fixing and betting degree.”

Because it occurs betting is against the law in India, however Singh identified it was ruled by a legislation that was “laughable” in its present type. The legislation is the 1867 Public Playing Act. These breaching it barely blink a watch, Singh mentioned, with solely a cursory financial penalty to pay. “We have to make a really sturdy legislation towards betting. Proper now the legislation that exists is completely archaic and the punishments in it are laughable. You impose a positive of INR 200 or 500 and that is the tip of it.”

Each John and Richardson agreed that the Playing Act ought to get replaced as quickly as doable. “Its fairly an anomaly which you could wager INR 500 on the result of a match for a facet to win/lose in India and that may be unlawful,” Richardson mentioned. “Nonetheless, when you provide USD 30,000 to a participant to underperform in that match then there’s nothing unlawful in that.”

Richardson identified that betting and corruption ought to been seen as separate solely as a result of betting was authorized in lots of international locations. “We’ve to be very, very clear right here that betting itself just isn’t corruption. So what’s corruption is people who find themselves making an attempt to get to gamers to deprave them as a way to become profitable from betting.”

Singh mentioned a part of the proposed legislation towards sports activities corruption ought to comprise a “specialised” investigating company, “which retains a correct database, which may be part of the dots, which when it sees an alert raised on its display so it might examine. Additionally the legislation is to facilitate higher investigation and higher appreciation of what proof might be collected and what proof is obtainable.”


Cheteshwar Pujara: ‘If you are mentally tough, you can take a long break comfortably’


Cheteshwar Pujara has resumed coaching thrice per week at his academy in Rajkot, together with just a few Saurashtra team-mates. In a distinct world, he would’ve been in England, taking part in for Gloucestershire within the county championship. Nevertheless, Covid-19 threatens to leave Pujara without competitive cricket for 10 months, with India’s subsequent Check task scheduled for December in Australia.

“You need to begin in some unspecified time in the future and it’s important,” Pujara informed PTI. “If you’ll the bottom, you’re getting used to the solar and out of doors setting. Most gamers have been indoors for such a very long time. Initially it’s nearly feeling the ball and as it’s, there’s loads of time earlier than cricket begins. I do not see any sequence occurring for the following two-three months, so one has to take issues regularly.”

ALSO READ: How Pujara spent life in lockdown

Pujara’s final aggressive outing was the Ranji Trophy final – the place Saurashtra beat Bengal – in March. With Indian state governments easing lockdown restrictions, he has resumed coaching outside. Most different prime India gamers proceed to coach indoors, largely engaged on private health even because the BCCI continues to deliberate on permitting gamers to return to coaching in a phased method.

“In case you are mentally robust, you may take a protracted break comfortably,” Pujara stated of the opportunity of going 10 months with out worldwide cricket. “Check matches [the only international format Pujara plays] do not occur steadily so one has to play home cricket. It was not such a giant factor for me and to return again from it, I shall be contemporary and extra desperate to play. The psychological problem isn’t a problem for me.”

Having returned to coaching, Pujara is presently batting for 20-25 minutes a session thrice per week. He hopes to regularly improve the depth. “As soon as you’re outside it’s a completely different feeling altogether,” he stated. “Coaching right here is clearly not the identical as you get in a group setting however at the least you’re doing one thing to get your self going.

“Your physique will begin transferring a bit after getting a routine. As a cricketer, you will need to begin each time attainable and cling to the federal government pointers [on social distancing] on the identical time. Clearly, it feels a bit completely different when you’re holding a bat after a very long time however as a result of I labored on my health, it’s serving to now that I’m taking part in once more.”

Pujara selected to give attention to the positives from the pressured break as a substitute of being annoyed. “Each cricketer offers with conditions otherwise. Mentally, some individuals do get annoyed however I simply took it as a break,” he stated. “I by no means felt that [I lost my edge] as a result of I’ve made comebacks after longer breaks [due to injury]. The comeback you make from an harm is way more durable than a scenario like this once I was not injured.

“The primary week [of training] is hard. After per week you’re again to regular, as a result of you’ve got performed this sport for such a very long time, expertise issues lots. No person is aware of what the scenario shall be three-four months down the road, when the following sequence shall be held. The following few months are about preparation and getting again into the sport. It’s too far to consider the following sequence.”


Ashok Dinda: ‘My Bengal career is finished’


Ashok Dinda‘s taking part in days for Bengal look like over, with the veteran paceman being linked with Puducherry, Chhattisgarh and Goa for the 2020-21 home season. The 36-year previous was dropped from the Bengal facet after taking part in only one sport within the 2019-20 Ranji Trophy after a spat with Ranadeb Bose, the bowling coach.

Dinda has been certainly one of Bengal’s most profitable bowlers, with 420 wickets in first-class cricket and 151 and 146 in Checklist A and T20s respectively.

“I’ve been related to Bengal cricket for a few years, and it has been my life, I’ve the perfect recollections of my time with the group,” he stated. “I can’t cease loving Bengal, however I can not play for them once more. It is completed. I wished to finish my profession with Bengal, however I haven’t got a selection now.”

ESPNcricinfo understands that Dinda has been in talks with all three associations, and at this stage, Chhattisgarh might be his likeliest vacation spot. He hasn’t but utilized to the Cricket Affiliation of Bengal for an NOC; if and when he does, the affiliation will let him go.

Dinda, who performed 13 ODIs and 9 T20Is between 2009 and 2013, performed Bengal’s first sport of the final Ranji season, in Thumba towards Kerala, and picked up three wickets. Quickly after that, he acquired right into a scrap with Bose on the sidelines of a coaching session at dwelling in Kolkata, following which he was ignored. He was given an opportunity to apologise to Bose, however refused.

The tempo spearhead’s absence did not appear to have damage Bengal, who reached the Ranji Trophy ultimate for the primary time since 2006-07 – the place they lost to Saurashtra – with the younger tempo trio of Akash Deep (35 wickets), Mukesh Kumar (32) and Ishan Porel (23) doing the job alongside spin frontman Shahbaz Ahmed, who picked up 35 wickets.

Sandeep Warrier strikes from Kerala to Tamil Nadu

In one other important transfer, Kerala quick bowler Sandeep Warrier will shift to Tamil Nadu for the subsequent season.

ESPNcricinfo understands that Warrier’s transfer is principally as a consequence of his current life circumstances. He has been residing in Chennai for the previous two years, trains on the MRF Tempo Academy within the metropolis, and is employed by India Cements. His spouse, a health care provider, is pursuing a grasp’s diploma in Chennai too, and the town has been dwelling for Warrier.

He has utilized to the Kerala Cricket Affiliation for an NOC and is assured of receiving it. Warrier may play as an area participant as an alternative of knowledgeable for Tamil Nadu – the TNCA have already indicated they are going to be glad to have him within the facet – since he has been employed within the state for greater than a 12 months.

Warrier, 29, has been Kerala’s main pacer up to now couple of seasons. Throughout their semi-final run in 2018-19, he picked up 44 wickets at a mean of 17.54 in ten matches. Final season, his appearances have been restricted since he was picked for India A, and he took 13 wickets in 4 matches at 22.84.


Rajinder Goel, the highest wicket-taker in Ranji Trophy, dies aged 77


Rajinder Goel, the best wicket-taker within the historical past of the Ranji Trophy with 637 strikes, has handed away on the age of 77 after a protracted sickness. In all, the Haryana left-arm spinner took 750 wickets in 157 first-class matches from 1958-59 to 1984-85. He bagged an unimaginable 53 five-fors and 17 ten-wicket match hauls.

Within the mid-1960s, when Bishan Singh Bedi was making his mark, the query that was requested was, “is he nearly as good as Goel?” Paradoxically, one motive Goel by no means performed for India was as a result of Bedi had cemented his spot within the India workforce. The closest Goel got here to play for India was within the unofficial Take a look at in opposition to Ceylon (now Sri Lanka) in 1964-65.

ALSO READ – I was born at the wrong time: Rajinder Goel

In September 1979, Goel picked up 6 for 102 in opposition to a visiting Australian aspect led by Kim Hughes. He continued taking part in first-class cricket till he was 43, with health proving a vital side of his lengthy and storied home profession. Even when he was in his final season in 1984-85, Goel educated arduous; his observe periods would contain 3500 skips of a rope and a long term, adopted by bowling to a minimum of 10 batsmen within the nets.

Goel could not win the Ranji Trophy as a participant, however he was the chairman of the Haryana choice committee in 1991 when a Kapil Dev-led aspect shocked Bombay (now Mumbai) on the Wankhede Stadium.

After his taking part in profession, Goel additionally served as a match referee in each males’s and ladies’s cricket.

In 2017, Goel acquired the CK Nayudu Lifetime Achievement Award. He is likely one of the 4 non-Take a look at gamers to have gotten the BCCI’s Lifetime Achievement Award; the others being Padmakar Shivalkar, Bhausaheb Nimbalkar and journalist KN Prabhu.


Rahul Dravid: ‘Don’t think we are in a position to resume cricket in India’


Rahul Dravid, the previous India captain and present head of cricket on the Nationwide Cricket Academy, has referred to as for a wait-and-watch strategy earlier than the resumption of cricket within the nation, within the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic. Dravid additionally prompt that the Indian home season may very well be trimmed if it would not begin on time.

“I do not suppose we’re able to renew…. It’s higher to be affected person and wait,” Dravid informed The Week, an Indian journal. “Now we have to take it month by month. One has to take a look at all choices. If the home season, which often begins by August-September, begins in October… one has to see whether or not the season needs to be shortened.

“Every little thing is unsure proper now. How a lot cricket shall be performed and what it’s going to take to have the ability to play will depend on the rules from the federal government and medical specialists. For us at NCA, the busiest time is from April to June. We usually have our zonal, U-16, U-19, U-23 camps taking place presently. [But] we needed to preserve redrawing plans. I simply hope we do not lose quite a lot of our cricket season, and that we are able to get some cricket this 12 months.”

Looking forward to a potential resumption, Dravid stated that the NCA, situated in Bengaluru, will first be aiming at coaching native cricketers. Last month, the Indian authorities had relaxed restrictions on sporting occasions, permitting them to renew behind closed doorways, however there are nonetheless journey restrictions in place and plenty of areas within the nation are nonetheless beneath lockdown.

ALSO READ: Dravid says bio-secure bubbles not a foolproof route to resuming cricket

“The NCA will probably open initially for some native cricketers,” Dravid stated. “These arriving from different locations must first quarantine themselves for 14 days. Whether or not that’s potential, we’ve to see.

“For home cricket, thankfully, we had been in a position to full most of our competitions earlier than the lockdown. Now we have to see whether or not gamers are comfy with inter-state journey. Our coaching programmes will rely on which home match shall be performed first. Whether it is T20, then we’ll begin the programme accordingly.”

The England-West Indies Take a look at sequence within the UK, which begins with the primary Take a look at from July eight in Southampton, will mark the resumption of worldwide cricket following the coronavirus outbreak. The three-Take a look at sequence shall be performed in bio-secure environments, however Dravid reckoned that it may not be as “simple” to create comparable environments at home stage in India. Final month, Dravid additionally stated that enjoying in a bio-secure bubble will not always be a viable solution within the Covid-19 period.

“In worldwide cricket, it’s potential,” Dravid stated of bio-secure environments. “I imagine the England-West Indies sequence shall be a lesson for all. It has its personal challenges. It’s not as simple on the home stage.”

Dravid stated that age-group camps is perhaps held if the Covid-19 scenario eases, however careworn that security was high precedence.

“The most effective-case state of affairs is that we can maintain some camps as soon as cricket exercise is allowed,” he stated. “The worst-case state of affairs is the season is completely washed out [for age-group cricket]. Lacking a couple of months of cricket is nothing in contrast with making certain we’re protected.”


Irfan Pathan: Could have been best allrounder India ever produced


Irfan Pathan burst onto the worldwide scene as an adolescent stuffed with promise, swing and runs, however performed his final worldwide match simply earlier than turning 28, in October 2012. Pathan, who retired from the sport solely in January this yr, completed with 29 Assessments, 120 ODIs and 24 T20Is. He usually needed to battle accidents and lengthy spells out of the sport, however Pathan held that if he been backed extra within the second half of his profession, he may have grow to be “one of the best all-rounder India ever produced” in ODIs.

“By way of achievement, there may have been much more. I actually consider that in one-day internationals, I may have been one of the best all-rounder that India ever produced, I may have been,” Pathan mentioned in an interview with “That did not occur as a result of I did not play as a lot cricket as I may have as a result of my final sport for India was on the age of 27.

“I see folks enjoying until the age of 35 or 37 like England quick bowler [James] Anderson. Clearly the circumstances in England are completely different. I feel should you play until 35, issues would have been higher, however that is gone, it is achieved and dusted.

“No matter matches I performed, I performed as a match-winner, I performed as a man who made the distinction to the crew. Even when I took one wicket — the primary wicket for the match — that made a huge impact on the crew. No matter innings I performed with the bat, I performed to make a distinction. That is what’s going to stick with me all through my complete life.”

In ODIs, Pathan held that his numbers have been used towards him even when his function within the crew modified from being a strike bowler to being the all-rounder who got here on first change.

“The one factor I all the time get dissatisfied is that lots of people solely see the numbers and numbers do not all the time provide the proper image. When you see the primary 59 ODI matches that I performed, I acquired to bowl with the brand new ball,” he mentioned. “And when you’re the brand new ball bowler, you bought the chance to bowl with the brand new ball in addition to the previous ball. Your intention, your mindset, your physique language and your accountability is to take wickets.

“If you end up bowling first change, when you’re a defensive bowler in response to your captain and coach, it’s a must to play the function of containing the runs. It’s a must to just remember to do not give away too many runs. So in case your function turns into completely different, then your numbers additionally grow to be completely different as properly.”

Pathan largely took the brand new ball for India in ODIs until the top of the Champions Trophy 2006. In that point, he performed 69 ODIs, and did not open the bowling on solely two events. In that interval, he took 113 wickets at a median of 24.78 and an financial system price of 4.96.

Having performed 69 ODIs in beneath three years, principally beneath Sourav Ganguly and Rahul Dravid’s captaincy, he went on to play solely 51 extra in his subsequent six years, a interval that coincided with MS Dhoni taking up the reins. He took the brand new ball solely 19 instances in that second half.

“I really really feel that folks from the crew ought to have spoken about it,” Pathan mentioned. “They need to have mentioned that, ‘Sure Irfan used to take wickets, however now we’ve got given him a special function. We have now given him the function of first change bowler and somebody who can bat at No. 7 or No. 8, which may be very a lot required in one-day cricket proper now.’ Now, if an allrounder goes for round six runs per over and takes one wicket per match, you might be pleased with that, however you weren’t pleased with Irfan Pathan who did the identical factor. Why is that?”

Whereas Pathan agreed {that a} participant wanted to be versatile, he held {that a} change in function wanted to be acknowledged, and supported, by the crew administration too.

“I’m not saying that I may solely bowl with the brand new ball. No, I used to be able to bowl with the previous ball, I used to be able to bowl with the brand new ball as properly. However in a crew sport, when you might have a special function, your numbers replicate in a different way. When Mahendra Singh Dhoni was the captain, he was once very versatile in his batting order, so his numbers was once completely different. Now when he’s not versatile, clearly his numbers are getting affected. That’s the reason both his common or strike price will even get affected. It is a crew sport. It isn’t solely about people.

“The participant needs to be versatile, but when his function has been given in a different way, then it’s the crew’s accountability to speak about it, however nobody talks about it.”


IPL to “review” sponsorship deals after India-China border tension


The IPL has convened a gathering of its Governing Council subsequent week to “evaluate numerous sponsorship offers” for the event following tensions this week on the India-China border. The transfer displays the truth that the IPL’s principal sponsors, together with title sponsor Vivo, have Chinese language possession or hyperlinks.

Whereas there was rigidity on the border within the Indian area of Leh for some days, the flashpoint was an incident on the night time of June 15; although particulars are scarce, the Indian authorities has stated that its military misplaced 20 troopers, together with one senior officer, within the incident.

Vivo, a Chinese language cell handset producer, first bagged the IPL title sponsorship for 2 years in 2015. In 2017 Vivo retained the rights signing a five-year contract, paying about USD 341 million. Quickly after, IPL additionally roped Paytm, the cell pockets firm, because the official Umpires Accomplice (an on-ground sponsor) between 2018-22 for an undisclosed quantity. One of many principal buyers in Paytm is Alibaba, a Chinese language e-commerce firm.

Posting a late tweet on Friday, the BCCI simply stated it will evaluate the IPL sponsorship offers however didn’t title precisely which of them.

The event comes a day after BCCI treasurer Arun Dhumal stated that though the board was open to reviewing any future offers (put up 2022), the present contract with Vivo was not prone to be scrapped. “While you speak emotionally, you have a tendency to go away the rationale behind,” Dhumal informed PTI on Thursday. “We’ve got to grasp the distinction between supporting a Chinese language firm for a Chinese language trigger or taking assist from Chinese language firm to help India’s trigger.

“Once we are permitting Chinese language firms to promote their merchandise in India, no matter cash they’re taking from Indian shopper, they’re paying a part of it to the BCCI (as model promotion) and the board is paying 42 p.c tax on that cash to the Indian authorities. So, that’s supporting India’s trigger and never China’s.”

The BCCI had not too long ago postponed the IPL indefinitely as a result of Covid-19 pandemic. It has already been burdened about shedding near INR 4000 crore (USD 0.53 billion roughly) in case the IPL doesn’t happen this 12 months. The BCCI has been ready for the ICC to make up its thoughts on the lads’s T20 World Cup, which is scheduled for October-November, in Australia however is likely to be postponed with the Cricket Australia preferring to host the event in 2021.